Readify

Joshua Nkomo

Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty

Joshua Nkomo was the leader of ZAPU, one of the two principal organizations that waged guerrilla rebellion against white-minority rule in Rhodesia. The account of his political role turns on a sharp reversal: the struggle that helped bring about Zimbabwe’s independence was followed by a post-independence settlement in which Mugabe consolidated power and Nkomo was pushed to the political margins.

Role in the Struggle for Independence

In 1965, the white elite, led by Ian Smith and representing possibly 5 percent of Rhodesia’s population, declared independence from Britain. Few governments recognized the declaration, and the United Nations imposed economic and political sanctions. Black citizens organized guerrilla resistance from bases in neighboring Mozambique and Zambia. ZAPU, led by Nkomo, and Mugabe’s ZANU were the two main groups in the rebellion.

International pressure and the armed challenge from these groups led to a negotiated end to white rule. In 1980, the state of Zimbabwe was created. Nkomo’s leadership of ZAPU therefore placed him among the central political actors in the transition from Rhodesian white-minority rule to independence.

The Post-Independence Reversal

Independence did not produce a lasting balance between the liberation movements. Mugabe quickly established personal control, eliminating or co-opting opponents. In Matabeleland, a heartland of support for ZAPU, violence in the early 1980s killed as many as twenty thousand people. The account identifies this violence as part of Mugabe’s consolidation of power, but does not describe Nkomo’s personal actions during it.

In 1987, ZAPU merged with ZANU to form ZANU-PF. Nkomo was then sidelined politically. The merger thus marked more than an organizational change: it accompanied the displacement of a leader who had headed one of the principal forces in the independence struggle.

Political Significance

The contrast between Nkomo’s place in the struggle and his diminished position after independence illustrates how the end of colonial or minority rule did not itself guarantee pluralistic politics. Mugabe rewrote the constitution inherited from the independence negotiations, changed his office from prime minister to president, abolished white voter rolls included in the agreement, and eventually removed the Senate and added legislative seats he could nominate. A de facto one-party state under Mugabe resulted.

Nkomo’s trajectory is presented through this broader institutional shift rather than through personal biography: he is identified as ZAPU’s leader, a participant in the rebellion that helped secure independence, and a political figure sidelined as the victorious governing order narrowed its competition.